Symposium: "Prisoners of the Asia-Pacific War" (Feb 7-8)

We are pleased to announce the opening of our online symposium titled “Prisoners of the Asia-Pacific War: History, Memory, and Forgetting” to registered audience members. The symposium will be held across two days between 16:00-19:30 on Tuesday, February 7 and 9:00-17:00 on Wednesday, February 8, Japan time. This symposium brings together scholars researching the histories, memorialization and forgetting of prisoners and prison camps of the Asia Pacific War. See the schedule below.

Author: 
Francis Gary Powers Jr., Keith Dunnavant
Reviewer: 
Robert Dienesch

Dienesch on Powers Jr. and Dunnavant, 'Spy Pilot: Francis Gary Powers, the U-2 Incident, and a Controversial Cold War Legacy'

Francis Gary Powers Jr., Keith Dunnavant. Spy Pilot: Francis Gary Powers, the U-2 Incident, and a Controversial Cold War Legacy. Amherst: Prometheus, 2019. Illustrations. 312 pp. $25.00 (cloth), ISBN 978-1-63388-468-7

Author: 
Sherzod Muminov
Reviewer: 
Katalin Ferber

Ferber on Muminov, 'Eleven Winters of Discontent: The Siberian Internment and the Making of a New Japan'

Sherzod Muminov. Eleven Winters of Discontent: The Siberian Internment and the Making of a New Japan. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2022. 384 pp. $45.00 (cloth), ISBN 978-0-674-98643-5.

Reviewed by Katalin Ferber (Retired from Waseda University, Freelance writer) Published on H-Japan (December, 2022) Commissioned by Martha Chaiklin

Re: Indulging Research Tangents: Interpreting Evidence Through the Lens of Age Differences

Sometime ago in the 90s (the 1990s) I developed materials for a discussion of the generational components at work in the election of 1860.  Thinking that this was a subject about which a good book could get me that inevitable offer from Yale, I spent a good deal of time with the extant literature on aging, political generations, and generations as a research concept.

Re: Indulging Research Tangents: Interpreting Evidence Through the Lens of Age Differences

Lois,

Thanks for the interesting response, especially about how we might study and consider intellectual disabilities historically. Admittedly, I did not consider if Samuel Freeland’s son genuinely suffered from what we might understand today as a developmental disability (broadly, that would include disorders such as down syndrome, autism, etc.). Considering I already felt that analyzing my subject matter through the lens of age and maturity was likely a tangent to begin with, this is a new (albeit interesting) rabbit hole far outside the scope of my research.

Re: Indulging Research Tangents: Interpreting Evidence Through the Lens of Age Differences

Dan's opening example made me think (once again) of the different perspectives one brings if one approaches Civil War-era documents with training in other historical fields. Recent years have seen the emergence, for example, of “girlhood studies” and especially of “Black girlhood” in ways that deeply inform my project. Scholarship on both free Black childhood in the nineteenth-century US and enslaved Black childhood in the nineteenth-century are deeply important to my interpretation of a range of documents.

Indulging Research Tangents: Interpreting Evidence Through the Lens of Age Differences

The H-CivWar Authors' Blog

In this post for the H-CivWar Author's Blog, Daniel Farrell shares research on and discusses the challenges of interpreting people’s behavior through the lens of age and age differences. Ultimately, how much emphasis should historians place on tangents, however interesting?

Subscribe to RSS - Prisoners of war