From "league & amity" to "absolute Tyranny": The History of Royal Government in the US Declaration of Independence
Author: Steven Sarson, Jean Moulin University - Lyon 3
Comment: Brendan McConville, Boston University
Tuesday, 4 April
with an in-person reception at 4:30 PM
Free, Hybrid Event - hosted by the Massachusetts Historical Society
This paper argues that the Declaration of Independence was not antimonarchist in principle. The document’s conclusion’s “circumstances of our migration and settlement here” referred (as in Thomas Jefferson’s draft) to a “league & amity with” the British people through the colonists’ adoption of “one common king.” British monarchs subsequently largely abided by the terms of that “league & amity,” and it was only when George III attempted to impose “an absolute Tyranny” that colonists revolted. The subsequent creation of a United States Republic thus resulted from historical experience of “the present King of Great Britain” rather than from egalitarian ideology.
The Pauline Maier Early American History Seminar invites you to join the conversation on Tuesday, 4 April at 5:00 PM. The seminar brings together a diverse group of scholars and interested members of the public to workshop a pre-circulated paper. After brief remarks from the author and an assigned commentator, the discussion is opened to the floor. All are encouraged to ask questions, provide feedback on the circulated essay, and discuss the topic at hand. Our sessions are free and open to everyone.
Register above to attend, and you will receive a confirmation message with instructions for attending the session. Please check your junk mail if you do not see this message, or contact the MHS for assistance.
Subscribers for the current year may now log in to access the paper for this session. All others who register will receive the paper by email the day before the seminar.
Want to receive advance copies of seminar papers in future sessions? Become a subscriber!
Questions? Email firstname.lastname@example.org.