In this episode, Robert and Yelena discuss two reviews they liked and one review that was less than impressive. They conclude that judging a review is at least partly subjective, and that a preference for extended anecdotes, historical background, and discussions of the literature varies by reader. Below are the three reviews we discussed.
An unlikable review:
- Fred Lamar Pearson, Jr. Review of John T. McGrath, The French in Early Florida: In the Eye of the Hurricane. American Historical Review107:1 (Feb. 2002): 184. (Available by subscription online)
Reviews we liked:
- Sarah H. Brown. Review of Roberts, Blain, Pageants, Parlors, and Pretty Women: Race and Beauty in the Twentieth-Century South. H-Florida, H-Net Reviews. January, 2015.
- Link on the H-Net Commons.
- Nicholas B. Breyfogle. Review of Moon, David, The Plough that Broke the Steppes: Agriculture and Environment on Russia’s Grasslands, 1700-1914. H-HistGeog, H-Net Reviews. February, 2015.
- Link on the H-Net Commons.
Follow H-Net Reviews on Twitter: @HNet_Reviews or subscribe to the H-Reviews listserv to receive new reviews daily in your email in-box.
Credits:
The Art of the Review was produced by Robert Cassanello and Yelena Kalinsky and sponsored by H-Net Humanities and Social Sciences Online and the University of Central Florida's Center for Humanities & Digital Research.
Posted in:
Categories: Podcast
0 Replies