Call for Papers: Transdisciplinarity in Architectural Practice

Naomi Clarke's picture
Call for Publications
November 25, 2015 to March 4, 2016
Subject Fields: 
Architecture and Architectural History, Art, Art History & Visual Studies, Urban Design and Planning, Research and Methodology, Urban History / Studies

Transdisciplinarity in Architectural Practice 

Inflection Vol. 3: New Order

In an age of globalised collaboration, architecture, as an isolated discipline, seems no longer equipped to address the demands of contemporary society. One solution offered in this crisis of relevance is transdisciplinarity; the hybridisation of architecture with adjacent disciplines. As such, this concept has risen to become the dominant mode of contemporary architectural practice. Transdisciplinarity is the New Order. 

This moment of adjacencies resembles art historian Rosalind Krauss’ critique of synthesised artistic practice. Her 1979 essay, “Sculpture in the Expanded Field,” sought to identify the core qualities of sculpture, architecture and land art at the point at which the three distinct disciplines were being hybridised. In defining the limits of each discipline, the concept of an expanded field provided a space to establish what each might become if strategically combined with adjacent fields of practice.

Architeture theorist Anthony Vidler translated Krauss’ thinking to the architectural context in 2004. His adaptation, “Architecture’s expanded field,” similarly assessed the limits of disciplinary borders against categories as far-reaching as biology, politics and technology. For Vidler, the expanded field was concerned with what occurs at the edge of conventional architecture as a means of innovation. 

But this porous disciplinary boundary, celebrated as recently as 2012 by curator Rory Hyde’s Future Practice: conversations from the edge of architecture, has been embraced within a contemporary conception of architecture. As Hyde discusses, the profession can now be defined through its relationship with external disciplines: geospatial, political, medical, anthropological, biological and philosophical.

Projects once considered to be on the “fringe” of architectural practice are now routine. The expanded field is now embraced and authenticated by educational institutions, symposiums, publications, and, crucially, public expectation. Architects are crowd-funding projects to circumvent the traditional client-architect business model. Architects now harness the potential of biological and chemical technologies to fundamentally alter the materials which constrain the built environment. Architects curate design festivals and civic interventions to facilitate the exchange of experience through event. 

Transdisciplinary practice has transcended conventional notions of architecture, displacing the production of built form as the prevailing mode of practice. To conceive of architecture simply as the act of designing and constructing buildings is too limiting. But what remains of the core tenets of architectural practice? Is this redefinition of architecture an advance or a retreat? 

Inflection Vol. 3 will explore the limits and the implications of this transdisciplinary age through a critical investigation of this current mode of practice. In tracing the trajectory of this New Order, this issue seeks to discover the matter that binds architecture together in this fragmented, yet hyperconnected epoch. 


Submission may include, but are not limited to essays, reviews, speculations, illustrations, photographs, or diagrams equivalent to a maximum of 3000 words. Some articles of 4500 words will be considered for peer review. Please email abstracts of maximum 300 words to by 25 NOVEMBER 2015. Articles less than 1500 words need not submit an abstract. Full submission for all articles due 4 MARCH 2016.