AICED 22: Re-writing / Re-imagining the Past

Dragos Manea Announcement
Subject Fields
American History / Studies, Cultural History / Studies, Film and Film History, Humanities, Literature









The English Department of the University of Bucharest invites proposals for the Literature and Cultural Studies section of its 22nd Annual International Conference:


Re-writing / Re-imagining the Past


To be held online, 3–5 June 2021


Keynote speakers:

Dr Felicity Hand (Autonomous University of Barcelona)

Prof. Jasmina Lukic (Central European University, Budapest)

Prof. Martin Puchner (Harvard University)

Prof. Roger Sabin (Central Saint Martins, University of the Arts London)

Dr Ana Karina Schneider (Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu)

Dr Constanța Vintilă (Nicolae Iorga Institute of History & New Europe College, Bucharest)


“I am all for putting new wine in old bottles,

especially if the pressure of the new one

makes the old bottles explode.”

 Angela Carter in “Notes from the Front Line”


Rewriting historical and canonical texts has been a persistent tradition in literature; looking backwards – towards the past – was a hallmark of the Renaissance, Neo-Classicism, Romanticism, Victorian literature, Modernism and Postmodernism. Nancy Walker posits that “the practice of appropriating existing stories in one’s own work – borrowing, revising, re-contextualizing – has a long and distinguished history” (The Disobedient Writer: Women and Narrative Tradition, 1995). Some works that reimagine the past do so overtly, others covertly, but in both cases they inevitably “both obscure and encode other stories” (Molly Hite, The Other Side of the Story: Structures and Strategies of Contemporary Feminist Narratives, 1989). One accusation levelled at texts rewriting the past is that they are simply derivative and unoriginal, but in their act of revising, writers do not simply look back: they see with fresh eyes, use the lens of new critical directions and offer new dimensions to the past (Adrienne Rich, “When We Dead Awaken: Writing as Re-Vision”, College English 34, 1972). A.S. Byatt has talked about interesting paths that can be explored while telling stories about secrecy, delving deeper into what the past had to hide and revealing the baggage of history (‘Forefathers’, On Histories and Stories: Selected Essays, 2001).

     Much recent scholarship has fruitfully traced the ways in which we construct narratives of the past and fill them with contemporary content or bend them to contemporary values. There remains, however, ample room for further exploring the afterlives of the past as constructed in the present. Re-imagining the past, as such, explores the imaginative reconstruction of the past in the writing of historians and in works of historical fiction. Rewriting reveals traces of the original, as interpreted by the author. It is a remnant of something that once was or has passed, but which continues to exist as echoes, relics, memories, or ghosts.

     To paraphrase David Lowenthal in The Past is a Foreign Country Revisited (2015), some texts turn the past into a backdrop for imaginary characters, while others use the lives of actual historical figures or even omit, distort or add to the past. Some fictional versions of the past are paradigms of the present, others are strikingly different; both invent pasts for the readers' delight, yet also strive to help readers feel and know the past in an effort to shed light on new ways of reconceptualizing our relationship with the past. Such works often aestheticize the experience of cultural and historical displacement, and propose alternative forms of continuity and identity.

    As such, we ask scholars to consider engagements with the past in terms of ongoing processes of reinvention, reproduction, and revision, as well as the reason why we choose to retell / rewrite / reimagine stories of the past. This conference invites papers that consider new ways of seeing the past, leading to a strengthening of or challenge to our understanding of the past, and productive and experimental ways of retelling, remaking and rebooting, resulting in new imaginaries that reconnect us to the past and are revealing for the present.



Possible topics may include (but are not limited to) the following:

  • Re-Imagining/re-writing various types of fiction / genres
  • Retellings of canonical texts
  • Intertextuality
  • Adaptation
  • Narrative approaches to the past
  • Afterlives of characters or authors
  • Reinvention and reproduction
  • Counter-narratives
  • Musical, visual, film retellings
  • Hauntology
  • Historical narratives in comics, film, and/or games.
  • Redefining identities through retelling, re-enactment, and revisionist histories (national identity, race, gender, and sexuality)
  • Appropriation, white-washing, and erasure in retelling
  • Recycling and re-imagining tropes and stereotypes
  • Remakes vs. sequels vs. reboots
  • The question of originality and artistry in adaptation
  • Memory and nostalgia
  • The social, political, and cultural implications of reinvention
  • Reimagining genres and aesthetics
  • Remixing and re-appropriation
  • The politics of remembering and representations of memory
  • Revising/Revisiting History
  • Historical fiction
  • Memory and Re-memory
  • Historiographic Metafiction
  • Revisitings of myth in reworkings, re-appropriations, and contestations of mythical tropes and figures
  • Writing back from (or into) the past: literature, history, and ideology
  • Historical drama/history plays, opera, and other historical re-enactments



Conference presentations should be in English, and will be allocated 20 minutes each, plus 10 minutes for discussion. Prospective participants are invited to submit abstracts of up to 200 words. Proposals should be in .doc or .docx format, and should also include (within the same document) name and institutional affiliation, a short bio (no more than 100 words), and e-mail address. Proposals for panel discussions (to be organized by the participant) will also be considered.


We look forward in particular to hosting a panel organized by the Romanian Studies Association of America, applying a Romanian Studies perspective to aspects of the conference theme.


A selection of papers from the conference will be published in University of Bucharest Review (ISSN 2069–8658) – listed on Erih Plus, Scopus, EBSCO (Literary Reference Centre Plus), CEEOL and Ulrichsweb. See the guidelines for contributors at


Deadline for proposals: 15 April 2021

Please send proposals (and enquiries) to .

Please note that the conference will be held entirely online. There will be no participation fee.

For further details and updates, see: .


(Enquiries regarding the Theoretical and Applied Linguistics section of the conference, which will be running at the same time, should be sent to .)


We look forward to receiving proposals.


 Organizing and Selection Committee:

Dr Maria-Sabina Draga Alexandru

Dr Alexandra Bacalu

Dr Alina Bottez

Dr James Brown

Dr Eliana Ionoaia

Dr Dragoș Manea

Prof. Mădălina Nicolaescu

Dr Andreea Paris-Popa

Dr Cristian Vîjea

Dr Oana-Alis Zaharia

Dr Ioana Zirra



Advisory Board:

Dr Nazmi Ağıl (Koç University, Istanbul)

Prof. Bart Eeckhout (University of Antwerp)

Prof. José Manuel Estévez-Saá (University of A Coruña)

Dr Felicity Hand (Autonomous University of Barcelona)

Prof. Michael Hattaway (New York University, London)

Prof. Carl Lavery (University of Glasgow)

Prof. Thomas Leitch (University of Delaware)

Dr Chris Louttit (Radboud University, Nijmegen)

Prof. Domnica Rădulescu (Washington and Lee University, Lexington)

Prof. Kerstin Shands (Södertörn University)

Prof. Nicolas Tredell (University of Sussex)

Contact Email