University of Minnesota
Cultural Studies and Comparative Literature
Materialisms: Reconciliations in the Present
Graduate Student Conference October 2-3, 2020
Samantha Frost is professor of political science at University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. Her research interests include modern political theory, contemporary political theory, feminist theory, biology, biopolitics. Her work focuses on the ways that our understanding of matter, materiality, or embodiment shapes our concepts of politics. She is the author of Lessons from a Materialist Thinker: Hobbesian Reflections on Ethics and Politics (Stanford UP, 2008) and Biocultural Creatures: Toward A New Theory of the Human (Duke UP, 2016), as well as the co-editor of New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency, and Politics (Duke UP, 2010).
Rocío Zambrana is associate professor of philosophy at Emory University. Her work examines conceptions of critique in various philosophical traditions, specifically Hegel, Marx, Frankfurt School Critical Theory; Marxist Feminisms; Decolonial Thought and Decolonial Feminisms; and Latinx, Latin American, and Caribbean Feminisms. She is the author of Hegel’s Theory of Intelligibility (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2015) and C olonial Debts: The Case of Puerto Rico (under contract, Duke UP).
Call for Papers
In an era marked by an excess of the human and its possessions, as well as its corollaries – perverse deprivation, subjective erasure, and an erosion of nonhuman life – by what means might we provide adequate analysis and offer paths of reconciliation with the present moment? This excess of the human cannot be spoken without reference to the neoliberal condition which has fomented callous accumulation of capital while relegating so much of humanity to the status of “surplus”. Such acknowledgement hails the historical materialism of Marx, yet, unspoken resides the unseen ‘vibrancies’ of the nonhuman. A new materialism of otherness, a t hing-power, must find rupture here. This otherness is that of the human made foreclosed by capital, yes, but additionally that of the nonhuman, the posthuman, the animal, inorganic matter, machines, atmospheres, the dead. How might the encounter between historical and new materialism permit us to communicate with, feel, and imagine the nonhuman while rendering visible the foreclosed human? In short, how might we imagine (things) otherwise?
We welcome submissions across disciplines, theories, methodologies, areas, and topics that address contemporary debates around these questions. We welcome a range of submissions, from theoretical and historical investigations, to close readings and interpretations of relevant media.
Topics of interest include, but are not limited to, the following:
neoliberal capitalism and historical materialism
new materialism and object-oriented-ontology
human and nonhuman agency
materiality and embodiment in posthumanism
new materialism and ecology
nonhuman agency/vibrancy and politics/biopolitics
nonhuman animals, objects, and matter in literature, film, art, music, video
feminism and new materialism
- materiality of media and media infrastructure
Please submit your 200-300 word abstracts in PDF or word, or any questions to email@example.com by July 31st, 2020. Include paper title, name, and affiliation in your abstract. In addition, you may include an optional 100 words maximum bio. You can expect notification of your proposal acceptance by early August.
Xiaoli Yang: firstname.lastname@example.org