Limited Seats available, register at: https://www.ipr.catholic.edu/permanent-neutrality?platform=hootsuite
This conference brings together policy makers, academics, and practitioners from around the globe to discuss an old idea; security through neutrality. What used to be common place even for the United States is only a distant memory today. Nevertheless, the paradigm holds intuitive appeal for Europe and Asia. In four panels this conference will introduce the main operative concepts that modern neutrals use to engage with the international community, and how they might be useful in parts of the world that do not currently deploy them.
Would a security architecture that involves ‘permanent neutrality’ help to reduce tension between the American Eagle, the Russian Bear, and the Chinese Dragon? Would the international community be receptive to more permanent neutrals? How would the China or the USA react to Taiwan as a permanent neutral, providing security, peace, and justice in the region? What if it was part of an East-Asian neutral security architecture that included the two Korean States? Could neutral buffer zones be beneficial to the neutral countries themselves while also serving the international community? These questions are not hypothetical; local stakeholders are already actively exploring them, as this conference will show.
Place: Hart Senate Office Building, Constitution Ave and 2nd St NE, Washington D.C. 20002, Capitol Hill — Room 902
Date: March 25th, 2019
Host Institution: Catholic University of America
Doors Open: 8.00 am
Program:
8:00 am – 8:45 am | Registration, Coffee & Pastry
8:45am – 8:50 am | Greetings from CUA
Invited: U.S. Senator Joe Manchin III of West Virginia
8:50 am – 8:55 am | Invocation
His Excellency Christophe Pierre Apostolic Nuncio to the United States of America
8:55 am – 9:00 am | Welcome Remarks
Professors Herbert Reginbogin, Marshall Breger, Pascal Lottaz
9:00 am – 9:50 am | Panel 1: Neutrality? What Neutrality?
For millennia, neutral strategies have been part of international life. While some fought, others did not. For the young United States, neutrality used to be a key pillar of its Foreign Policy for 150 years from Washington’s proclamation of neutrality to the four neutrality laws that Congress passed in the 1930s under Roosevelt. Where did that go? Was the entire approach no more than a welcome excuse to practice isolationism while the young nation built itself? Was it perhaps a well-intended experiment with pacifism? Most relevant today, is neutrality morally justifiable in the face of pure evil like a terrorist threat and power-hungry dictatorships?
Shawn Turner (Moderator) Director of Communication, Center for a New American Security
Pascal Lottaz Assistant Professor (appointed), Waseda University, Japan
Heinz Gaertner Professor, University of Vienna
Gunther Hauser National Defense Academy / Austrian Ministry of Defense
Herbert Reginbogin Fellow, Institute of Policy Research, Catholic University of America; Visiting Professor, Kehl University, Germany
10:00 am – 11:00 am | Panel 2: Neutrality & International Law
During the long nineteenth century, neutrality became an integral part of International Law. This panel will explore the progress of neutrality as a practical policy and analyze the changing nature of the rights and duties of neutrals on land and on the sea. What are the implications for the Post-WWII American-led liberal world order? How did the concept move from the realm of strategy to that of law and was it successful? Can modern neutrals still build upon the provisions of old or are those days gone?
Marshall Breger (Moderator) Professor Columbus School of Law, Catholic University of America
Ruth Wedgewood Professor of International Law and Diplomacy, Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies
Terrence Hopmann Professor of International Relations, Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies
Stephen Neff Professor of War and Peace, University of Edinburgh
Herbert Reginbogin Fellow, Institute of Policy Research, Catholic University of America; Visiting Professor Kehl University, Germany
11:00 am – 11:30 am | Break: Coffee and Sandwiches
11:30 am – 12:40 pm | Panel 3: Neutral solutions to currentaffairs?
The Cold War is dead. Long live the Cold War. As tensions in East and West are rising, new hot-spots of Great Power rivalry are forming. The The Cold War is dead. Long live the Cold War. As tensions in East and West are rising, new hot-spots of Great Power rivalry are forming. The looming confrontation between NATO and Russia have produced a frozen conflict in Ukraine and Georgia, with more violence to come, unless a permanent solution can pacify the region. In Asia, the situation in the Pacific is also increasingly volatile with China’s new-found self-confidence in its economic power and the seemingly unstoppable militarization of the South China Sea. Taiwan will take center stage in the coming years as mainland China claims its territory, while a staunchly democratic local population fights for its right to self-determination at a geostrategic cross-road. Could neutrality hold the key to peaceful solutions in both cases? What role could permanent neutrality play in a reunified Korea? The potential of permanent neutrality as a way to deliver security guarantees and socio-economic benefits to all players in the grand-game of Power Politics will be the focus of this panel.
Heinz Gaertner (Moderator) Professor, University of Vienna
Hsiu-lien (Annette) Lu Former V.P. of the Republic of China (Taiwan)
Pascal Lottaz Assistant Professor (appointed), Waseda University, Japan
Michael O’Hanlon Senior Fellow, Brookings Institute
Glenn Diesen Professor, Higher School of Economics, Moscow University
12:50 pm – 1:50 pm | Panel 4: Neutral Security Architecture(s)
To offer new perspectives, this session will look ahead and discuss how neutral solutions could benefit the global security environment and national economies. With the end of the Pax-Americana and the re-emergence of a multi-polar world, what would a global security architecture look like that was built on pillars of neutral conduct? Furthermore, what could be the new roles of permanently neutral members of the international community? What are the economic implications and what would it mean for humanitarianism if permanent neutrality became a major paradigm again in the twenty-first century?
Michael O’Hanlon (Moderator) Senior Fellow, Brookings Institute
Herbert Reginbogin Fellow, Institute of Policy Research, Catholic University of America, Visiting Professor Kehl University, Germany
Gunther Hauser National Defense Academy / Austrian Ministry of Defense
Oliver Bange Lecturer, University of Mannheim
Michael Tsai Former Minister of Defense of the Republic of China (Taiwan)
More information: https://www.ipr.catholic.edu/neutrality-conference-program?platform=hoot...
Registration: http://events.r20.constantcontact.com/register/event?oeidk=a07eg1jvf2jc7...
Institute for Policy Research at The Catholic University of America
IPR
202-319-5999
cua-iprstaff@cua.edu