Dear H-Buddhism members:
I am very happy to announce the release of my book, The Snake and the Mongoose: The Emergence of Identity in Early Indian Religion by Oxford University Press. Since my book deals with the emergence of Buddhist identity vis-à-vis Brahmanism, it will be of interest to many if not most H-Buddhism members.
For your reference, here is the blurb from the dust jacket:
Since the beginning of modern Indology in the 19th century, the relationship between the early Indian religions of Buddhism, Jainism, and Hinduism has been predicated on a perceived dichotomy between two meta-historical identities: "the Brahmans" (purveyors of the ancient Vedic texts and associated ritual system) and the newer "non-Brahmanical" sramana movements from which the Buddhists and Jains emerged. Textbook and scholarly accounts postulate an opposition between these two groups, citing the 2nd-century grammarian Patanjali, who is often quoted (erroneously) as likening them to the proverbial enemies snake and mongoose. Scholars continue to privilege Brahmanical Hindu accounts of early Indian history, and portray Buddhist and Jain deviations from those accounts as evidence of their opposition to a pre-existing Brahmanism.
In The Snake and the Mongoose, Nathan McGovern turns this commonly-accepted model of the origins of the early Indian religions on its head. His book seeks to de-center the Hindu Brahman from our understanding of Indian religion by "taming the snake and the mongoose"--that is, by abandoning the anachronistic distinction between "Brahmanical" and "non-Brahmanical." Instead, McGovern allows the earliest articulations of identity in Indian religion to speak for themselves through a comparative reading of texts preserved by the three major groups that emerged from the social, political, cultural, and religious foment of the late first millennium BCE: the Buddhists and Jains as they represented themselves in their earliest sutras, and the Vedic Brahmans as they represented themselves in their Dharma Sutras. The picture that emerges is not of a fundamental dichotomy between Brahmanical and non-Brahmanical, but rather of many different groups who all saw themselves as Brahmanical. It was through the contestation between these groups, says McGovern, that the distinction between Brahmanical and non-Brahmanical--the snake and the mongoose--emerged.
Assistant Professor of Religious Studies
University of Wisconsin-Whitewater