Jacob’s comment is very valuable, and the book on archival science he is referring to is clearly a “must have” item.
As Michael said, form is content with official Chinese documents. I found the following handbook very helpful:
黄存勋，刘文杰，雷荣广： 档案文献学 (高等学校教材）
Tim's insightful comment made me think of possibilities for extending the space of comparison. It would be interesting, for example in a grad seminar, to start with this document and similar examples of bureaucratic production in the past (Qing and Republican) but then add examples from other bureaucracies. And not just the socialist ones.
Last month on the original PRCHistory email list Felix Wemheuer asked about reviews of Dikötter's Tragedy of Liberation. A joint review of Mitter's China's War with Japan and Dikötter's book was just published here:
This document is an absolute delight. Of course, we all see the similarity in layout to Repbulican administrative documents and echoes of Qing documents.
We are very excited to announce a new section of the prchistory.org website -- "Research Notes."
The current notes cover ongoing research programs, histories, and states of the field with special reference to China- and PRC-related research communities based in Europe. Titles appear below. Reports can be accessed via http://prchistory.org/notes/
We are immensely grateful to the current contributors. If you or a colleague would like to add a report to the page, please contact H-PRC News (newshprc at gmail dot com).
Welcome to those who have recently joined H-PRC, the PRC History Group's new H-Net network for scholars with interests in the history of the People's Republic of China! All of you have the ability to create discussion posts, and most of you are authorized to upload images, videos, and other content. So please feel free to ask questions and share resources. Posts are moderated, but we will only block spam or genuinely inappropriate comments.