Your network editor has reposted this from H-Announce. The byline reflects the original authorship.
Northeastern Modern Language Association (NeMLA)
March 5-8, 2020
Marriot Copley Place
There are two major trends in contemporary German literature when we think of the notion of Heimat: On the one hand we find a ubiquitous migrant literature, the crossing of boundaries, the internationality and intersectionality of characters who are at home in a global village – or what Ursula März calls a representation of “biographic and cultural nomadism.” This “Literatur der Eingewanderten” (März) by authors such as Sasha Marianna Salzmann, Hatice Akyün, Lena Gorelik, Irena Brezna, or Olga Grasnowaja, among many others, accompanies an era of migration and an era in which notions such as national and cultural identity must be renegotiated. On the other hand, the dominance of migrant literature seems to stand in stark contrast to an emphasis on spatial limitations and rural settings rather than border crossings and globalization: an abundance of Heimatliterature.
Arguably as a reaction to an era of migration, Heimathas gained new prominence in the German political landscape around the 2017 federal election campaign, even leading to the new addition to the Ministry of the Interior, theHeimatDepartment. This prominence runs parallel to a renaissance of Heimatliterature, as texts in rural settings that harken back to the “Dorfroman” of the late 19thcentury populate the bestseller lists. Authors such as Mariana Lekys, Alina Helbing, Andreas Moster, Katrin Seddig, Norbert Scheuer, Katharina Hacker, Josef Bierbichler, and Dörte Hansen have provided a body of texts whose extensiveness alone makes it questionable to push the notion of Heimataside as a misguided principle of the reactionary right.
„Das Dorf boomt – die Dörfer sterben“, so write Werner Nell and Marc Weiland in the introduction to the essay collection Imaginäre Dörfer(2014). While the emphasis on the rural contrasts ongoing urbanization, the loss of Heimatand search for new identities in migrant literature recalls the Germany of the 1950s and the popularity of the Heimatfilm, a genre that examined the implications of these same questions. On closer inspection, then, the two larger trends may be complementary rather than contradictory.
This seminar is interested in evaluating these two trends with regard to their intersections. Contributions that explicitly combine Heimat- and migrant literature are especially welcome. Examinations on identity, spatiality, urbanization, and “Landflucht,” for example, that refer to either genre (Heimatand migrant literature) will also be considered.
Potential topics include, but are not limited to:
- Analysis and evaluation of the new German political Heimatdiscourse in the context of migration trends
- Discussions regarding the extent to which the notions of a new Heimatdiscourse, new Heimatliterature, and new Heimat/AntiHeimatfilmare appropriate and/or useful
- Discussions of the notion of new Heimatliterature visà-vis the tradition of the term and the genre
- Discussions of contemporary Heimat and AntiHeimatfilm
- Interpretations of specific works of Heimator migrant literature
- Analysis of the Dorfromanand how it relates to the current discourse on Heimat
- Heimatand the spatial turn
- Heimatand the discussion of privilege in recent novels or films
Please submit abstracts of approximately 250 words, including the submitter’s biographical information, through the NeMLA website: https://www.cfplist.com/nemla/Home/S/17993
Submission deadline: September 30, 2019