Greetings,
For the Arabic speakers on this list, I've a couple of questions.
1) In the English translations of instructions for wudu' in both prayer books and Kitab-i-Aqdas, it appears as if the instructions to recite specific verses whilst washing the hands and face only apply to the middle salat, yet in Rituals in Babism and Baha'ism by Denis MacEoin he says (p.39) this is misleading as in editions other than Adi'a-yi hadrat-i mahbub (and English translations), the instructions for wudu' are written separately from the prayers. For example, see Salat wa Siyam (https://goo.gl/cdH1Mw). This would imply the wudu' verses should apply to ablutions performed for all the obligatory prayers, and presumably the daily dhikr. Indeed in Salat wa Siyam, the ablutions verses are not even printed again with the middle salat.
Is this because Shoghi Effendi was working from Adi'a-yi hadrat-i mahbub and given the instructions in the other Arabic editions, it should therefore be updated in English translation? Thoughts?
2) In the long salat, there are three occasions where one is to supplicate raising the hands in qunut, unlike the Islamic salat, in which qunut is prayed once during certain salats (witr, and fajr). The instructions in the long salat are:
First qunut:
ثمّ يرفع يديه للقنوت لله تبارك وتعالى ويقول
Second qunut:
ثمّ يرفع يديه للقنوت مرّة أخرى ويقول
Third qunut:
ثمّ يقوم ويرفع يديه للقنوت مرّة بعد أخرى ويقول
Now it seems logical to me that in the third qunut the phrase " مرّة بعد أخرى" refers to the fact it is the third qunut, not that one is to raise the hands twice at this point. That is, the first qunut is given, then qunut another time (مرّة أخرى) then, qunut a time after the other time ( مرّة بعد أخرى). Am I missing something? If so, what's the deal with the English instructions to raise the hands twice - it seems like an odd movement to make given it's a qunut.
Best
Rachel
8 Replies
Firuz Oskooi
Interesting observation. Hope a few scholars will respond.
Iskandar Hai
The performance of the ablution is necessary for any one of the three obligatory prayers but, the saying of the verses while doing the ablution is mandatory only for the medium prayer solely.
Regarding your other question, "twice" implies a second time, not two times. Just as "thrice" implies a third time and not three times.
Best regards,
Iskandar
Anthony A. Lee
Dear Rachel:
I am very happy to see H-Bahai spring back to life after a very long
sleep. I hope this can begin a new series of discussions.
I hope that someone who knows more than I do can answer your specific
questions. But I find the questions curious for a number of reasons.
Legalistic question of the kind you are asking, especially when they are
concerned with private rituals, are usually distasteful to Baha'is.
Normally, they are avoided. First, because no one can give an
authoratative answer to such questions as they relate to prayer (at least,
in the absence of a living Guardian). Second, because such matter are
generally considered private, and unimportant. Who cares if the believer
raises his hands twice or three times while saying the prayer. And third,
because it is understood that there is a variety of practice as relates to
ritual observance within the Baha'i community. No one really wants to
start an argument about such things, because it cannot be resolved.
Ablutions have never been observed by the Western Baha'i community, and I
don't think that they are ever likely to be. Perhaps the exception is for
the Medium Obligatory Prayer because of the instructions in the
prayerbook. I seem to recall a letter from Shoghi Effendi to the NSA of
the United States saying that such matters were not binding on the Western
Baha'is at that time, and that it would all be explained when the Aqdas was
translated an published. So, I have never seen or heard of Western
believers performing ablutions before prayers.
I think that this is likely to remain the case indefinitely. This is
because Baha'u'llah abolished the idea of ritual impurity. So, the
spiritual rationale for ablutions was removed. There is no need to wash as
a means of establishing ritual purity before prayer. It is already
established. The only function of ablutions might be as a preparation for
prayer, to put oneself into a prayerful state of mind, so to speak. But,
of course, that might be accomplished in other ways.
In any case, your questions might have answers that someone else can
provide. I rather doubt it, but perhaps. I do think, however, that it is
perhaps more important to observe the context of actual Baha'i practice in
which your questions are asked.
Warm regards,
Anthony A. Lee
Glenn Cameron
"Ablutions have never been observed by the Western Baha'i community, and I don't think that they are ever likely to be."
Could you expand on those two points please Tony?
Sincerely,
Glenn Cameron
Rachel Woodlock
Greetings,
Iskandar wrote: "the saying of the verses while doing the ablution is mandatory only for the medium prayer solely" and, Anthony wrote:
"no one can give an authoratative answer to such questions as they relate to prayer (at least, in the absence of a living Guardian)"
Yes, that's the official position, but my interest is more in Baha'i shari`a from a textual analysis. I'm not an expert in palaeography but I would be interested in whether the (second) Lawh-i-Salat manuscript is digitised and available for study. Does anyone know?
Also, Anthony, I could be mistaken, but I thought the House's 1999 letter "Further Application of the Laws of the Kitab-i-Aqdas" made the fiqh of salat including wudu' obligatory on everyone.
https://bahai-library.com/uhj_further_application_aqdas
Iskandar also wrote: "Regarding your other question, 'twice' implies a second time, not two times. Just as 'thrice' implies a third time and not three times."
The word for twice is مرتين whereas it reads (to me anyway) "مرّة بعد أخرى" is literally "time after the other" and "the other" is the second qunut.
I do hope H-Baha'i springs back into life too Anthony, I've kind of missed it :)
With kind regards
Rachel
Sen McGlinn
As for your first question, here's two examples where the ablutions and the verse are attached only to the medium obligatory prayer:
http://reference.bahai.org/fa/t/b/PM/pm-205.html
http://reference.bahai.org/fa/t/c/GHA/gha-34.html
The problem is, these are editorial choices. How do we know whether they are informed choices ?
Rachel Woodlock
Sen wrote: "The problem is, these are editorial choices. How do we know whether they are informed choices ?"
That's why I'd be interested to see a manuscript rather than a printed edition.
It is true that Baha'is do not obsess over the minutiae of prayer positions to the same degree that Muslims do, and certainly the general thrust of advice given by the institutions has largely been to let Baha'is decide for themselves individually how they might implement movements and postures. It's also probably true that where you have a jama'at such as with Islamic salat it makes sense that everyone do the same thing (although of course, in reality the minor differences continued and you might find a line where one worshipper folds their hands over their chest, and another leaves their hands by their sides etc.), whilst in Baha'i salat, it is prayed individually by design so uniformity is probably not as cogent.
Still, Baha'u'llah chose to reveal various ablutions and movements as part of his salat, which would suggest to me they have an importance that seems worthy of serious attention when considering the fiqh of Baha'i salat.
I do find it curious that there is almost a sense of distaste when it comes to approaching Baha'i shari`a comparatively to Islamic and Babi shari' rulings.
Best
Rachel
Iskandar Hai
Dear Sen:
What do you mean by "these are editorial choices."?
Warmest regards,
Iskandar
Sen McGlinn wrote:
As for your first question, here's two examples where the ablutions and the verse are attached only to the medium obligatory prayer:
http://reference.bahai.org/fa/t/b/PM/pm-205.html
http://reference.bahai.org/fa/t/c/GHA/gha-34.html
The problem is, these are editorial choices. How do we know whether they are informed choices ?